Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 03:44:27 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ken Gunderson <kgunders@teamcool.net> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the jem report bashes fbsd-6.0 Message-ID: <20060127084427.GA35556@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060127012902.61e974dd.kgunders@teamcool.net> References: <20060127012902.61e974dd.kgunders@teamcool.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 01:29:02AM -0700, Ken Gunderson wrote: > An older article I just happened across: >=20 > <http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/194/45/>; >=20 > Personally think he's far off the mark, e.g. >=20 > "The AMD64 edition didn't work well on two systems. Since it has a long > and inglorious history of severe stability problems that appear to have > carried over into 6.0, I would strongly recommend using the i386 > edition of FreeBSD instead of the AMD64 edition." >=20 > Definitely not congruous with my experiences but then my amd64 systems > are far from stressed:-) But thought I'd post the link in case someone > wanted to address in more detail. You're right that it's old news, but the consensus seemed to be that he's posting from some kind of weird parallel universe where things work Differently :-) Kris --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD2d1rWry0BWjoQKURAp1UAJ9Hpovhh92Pr8oQyjr1LmiA1KYwywCggCVR UmBDjRIow4iPlVTAjCfofv0= =CVls -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060127084427.GA35556>