Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 18:53:17 +1030 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith), jb@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Config datafile... Message-ID: <199712130823.SAA01759@word.smith.net.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 13 Dec 1997 03:21:54 -0000." <199712130321.UAA27603@usr04.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Apollo did it *much* better, and it's beginning to sound like LDAP will > > inherit the mantle. > > Not if it can't do transactions. ... > Really, LDAP is not mature enough at this point, except for embedded > systems where you can guarantee the behaviour of the back end, and > the back end is either not write-cached, or understands the > significance of container objects implicit by hierarchy. What you appear to be saying is that you cannot perform complex atomic transactions, nor are transactions guaranteed to be serialised. There, I did it in two lines. 8) mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712130823.SAA01759>