Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 09:04:36 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: Christian Fortin <cfortin@ec.camitel.com> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, sales@cyclades.com Subject: RE: sync card? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970911085737.818a@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.970910182134.cfortin@ec.camitel.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Christian Fortin wrote: > We use Cyclades 16y, The Cyclades is ASYNCHRONOUS, not SYNCHRONOUS. > and the driver is not for eveay duty ISP. > It work fine for terminal, but it's was not full proof for work with TUN. > I try to have some kind of support, but the driver is not made by Cyclades > And they dont take the responsability to support it. > The companie have a full support for Linux but not for FreeBSD. Sadly, it is true that Cyclades supports Linux but not FreeBSD, but I found there was plenty of support from FreeBSD-isp, FreeBSD-hackers. > We plan to buy some others boards, If you have some experience with your > driver/supplyer/PPP Well, you can also try the Stallion boards, but before you ditch Cyclades note well that the Linux drivers for Cyclades are add-ons supplied by Cyclades; the FreeBSD driver is ***integrated into the FreeBSD kernel***. This is why you need to ask FreeBSD people about the driver, not Cyclades Inc. I have found the Cyclades cards to work well, without much fuss, except for some CLOCAL problems. What problems did you experience? Dannyhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970911085737.818a>