Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:35:42 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux base/devtools/kdump Message-ID: <20030301193542.GB548@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20030301191622.GC294@galgenberg.net> References: <20030301191622.GC294@galgenberg.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:16:22PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > > I wanted to know what is planned in respect to the linux-ports. First of > all, will there be a linux_base-8 port any time soon? Not by me. > Then I found out, that the port-nameing is kind of non-user friendly: > > RH6: linux_base-6 linux_devtools linux_kdump > RH7: linux_base linux_devtools-7 N/A I know. > If RH7 is going to be the default for many more releases to come, I > would kindly ask marcel@ to please provide an updated linux_kdump port, > because it won't compile with RH7 I have it somewhere on the bottom of my todo list. > I got WINE compiled under a /compat/linux chroot and it's failing > because of missing ioctl's and I figured that I would need linux_kdump > to investigate further. You can also use truss(1) > I can also provide updated linux_base/linux_devtools-7 ports, which > include bison/sed/cut/etc. which are needed for configure scripts to run > in a chrooted linux-environment Please don't. The ports should be minimal. They are specifically not designed to create a standalone (chrootable) environment. They are specifically designed to allow anyone to add packages themselves. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030301193542.GB548>