Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:34:15 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lock annotations: enable them for libpthread, libstdthreads Message-ID: <CAJOYFBAo6KOuWuXcduA8DJZxNg7W8bAhM5ydGAhPKCdLMjWsvQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140828171859.GA81757@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <CAJOYFBBbzu9ouwfUk1%2B1MLW0B2y%2B5JTD9-b0%2BkiymOT=xKU0uQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140828171859.GA81757@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 August 2014 19:18, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > What it is the performance penalty (time and memory)? That is, > buildworld already takes a looooonnnnng time on my system because > of clang. My gut feeling is that impact is minimal. Buildworlds seem to take approximately the same time, mainly because we don't have that many annotated objects/functions/expressions. I will do some measurements. -- Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJOYFBAo6KOuWuXcduA8DJZxNg7W8bAhM5ydGAhPKCdLMjWsvQ>