Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:57:51 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SF Bay area hackfest Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10403240757080.22672-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <200403240914.10447.dfr@nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Wednesday 24 March 2004 00:36, Julian Elischer wrote: > > The linker and dynamic linker are expected to 'plonk' snippets of > > machine dependent code into whereever an access to TLS is being made, > > depending on whether the access is to the same statically linked > > module or another module, loaded at run time, or the 'main' module. > > The "wheres" for these 'runtime code-insertions' are marked by the > > toolchain. > > I'll take the dynamic linker if no-one else wants it. I'm not coming to > the bay area to do it though :-). I've been seriously considering > putting in symbol version support too. Yes, please! -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10403240757080.22672-100000>