Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:02:57 -0800
From:      "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net>
To:        Dan Partelly <dan_partelly@rdsor.ro>
Cc:        Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, <sjg@juniper.net>
Subject:   Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?
Message-ID:  <18325.1447711377@chaos>
In-Reply-To: <EF093D34-B08D-430B-87D1-5B7612DFAB9A@rdsor.ro>
References:  <0650CA79-5711-44BF-AC3F-0C5C5B6E5BD9@rdsor.ro> <CAJ-Vmokfo_BGWji9TrgQ40oRxqht9-2iEZVon7aQxR_93Ufxyg@mail.gmail.com> <702A1341-FB0C-41FA-AB95-F84858A7B3A4@rdsor.ro> <26127.1447610752@chaos> <EF093D34-B08D-430B-87D1-5B7612DFAB9A@rdsor.ro>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

Dan Partelly <dan_partelly@rdsor.ro> wrote:
> >> The ability to get machine parsable output from OS components is a big part of the success of Junos CLI, netconf etc.
> 
> Once you get machine parsable output, and feed it to your GUIs , WEB,
> other tools, and modify it, how do you feed it back to your underlying
> OS ?

We didn't make any changes to the way tools are run as there was no
need.

All requests - whether from CLI, NETCONF etc, are channeled into the MGD
(management daemon) to verify input, permissions etc (Junos implements
very fine grained permission system), and act accordingly.


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18325.1447711377>