Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:26:45 +0900 (JST) From: Yoshiaki Kasahara <kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp> To: freebsd@jdc.parodius.com Cc: pjd@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 8.0 kmem map too small Message-ID: <20100608.192645.266793829033956713.kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20100608095444.GA86953@icarus.home.lan> References: <4BE82C5D.1080806@bit0.com> <20100608.181146.1224841629154014733.kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp> <20100608095444.GA86953@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 02:54:44 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> said: > I realise you're talking about amd64, but I'm not sure how UMA is > getting enabled on i386 to begin with. It does look like it's enabled > on amd64 by default. I believe that this thread had been started before this tunable was introduced on May 24th. Before that, ZIO_USE_UMA was used to control the use of UMA, and it was enabled unconditionally in /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs. -- Yoshiaki Kasahara Research Institute for Information Technology, Kyushu University kasahara@nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100608.192645.266793829033956713.kasahara>