Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:56:44 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> To: "Abhishek Gupta (LIS)" <abgupta@microsoft.com>, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Hyper-V 2012 Cluster / Failover - supported? - Any known issues? Message-ID: <61A92208F36F7F74F8D856F1@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <9cabc6fbba754dd3aa357943ef82db22@BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <18D121A056145C32F0501114@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <155969fa70a34e41a84649bf3cb81c21@BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> ,<4787C47D82401721B4C53B49@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <9cabc6fbba754dd3aa357943ef82db22@BL2PR03MB210.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On 18 September 2013 14:50 +0000 "Abhishek Gupta (LIS)" <abgupta@microsoft.com> wrote: > Thanks again Karl! Yes, it should work. My understanding is that the > failover should be agnostic to the guest OS but there could be some > integration component that we might have missed. So it would be good to > get to the bottom of this. Ok, I've repeated the test twice now - and it's succeeded both times, so it looks likely the Synology patch did 'something' that had a knock on effect for this. fwiw/incase anyone else hit this - our test setup comprises of a pair of D412+ NAS's (active/passive) and they're now running DSM v4.3-3776-1 (which was apparently released in the last few days) - so far (fingers crossed) this appears to be working for us now. I'll be re-testing it probably multiple times over the next few days - if I hit any other issues - I'll let you know, and thanks again, Regards, -Karl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?61A92208F36F7F74F8D856F1>