Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 02 May 2005 16:24:07 +0300
From:      Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Arne_=5C=22W=F6rner=5C=22=22?= <arne_woerner@yahoo.com>
Subject:   Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x
Message-ID:  <427629F7.5060704@he.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <17336.1115038283@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <17336.1115038283@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>In message <42761FA7.1030500@centtech.com>, Eric Anderson writes:
>  
>
>>I'll be honest here, I don't care much if the speed difference between 
>>4.X and 5.X is measureable, or whatever.  What I find is a little 
>>telling of an issue somewhere, is that READS are slower than WRITES! 
>>This is totally bogus to me - [...]
>>    
>>
>
>If the disk has bad sectors or other hardware issues, this is not
>an atypical result.
>
>  
>
The drives I have report this using SMART and the counters stay at zero. 
Yes, we've seen the counters go nonzero when problems do exist.

Pete



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?427629F7.5060704>