Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Apr 2000 02:34:42 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>
To:        David Holloway <davidhol@windriver.com>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Overwhelming messages from /sys/netinet/if_ether.c 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSI.4.21.0004080231110.29341-100000@blues.jpj.net>
In-Reply-To: <200004071942.MAA01133@papermill.wrs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I say with 99% certainty that assigning 0.0.0.0 to
> the interface is a requirement of dhcp.
> 
> You can't stop using it and expect dhcp to work.

The Linux folks stopped doing it:

   2.0 supported the net interface 0.0.0.0 IP address convention (meaning
   the kernel should accept all IP packets). 2.[12] don't, hence things
   like many bootp/dhcp configurations which used this feature break.

   The proper fix is to modify bootp/dhcp clients to accomplish the same
   thing using raw sockets instead. I think dhcpcd
   (<URL:http://www.phystech.com/download/dhcpcd.html>) already works
   this way, but bootpc hasn't been updated yet.

--message from David Wragg (dpw@doc.ic.ac.uk) at
  http://www.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/1999week05/0601.html
__
Trevor Johnson



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.4.21.0004080231110.29341-100000>