Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:02:11 -0700 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r286995 - head/share/mk Message-ID: <5602DB13.2000202@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrKeV3yXOs-rQ92SquroL1tpFsr=obPa4a=19F%2Bs%2BZuTA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201508211515.t7LFFM0U028322@repo.freebsd.org> <56023395.2080904@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfrKeV3yXOs-rQ92SquroL1tpFsr=obPa4a=19F%2Bs%2BZuTA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --JIRWlWAJMvTisCumawSwMO3sGWToflDiW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9/23/2015 9:44 AM, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org > <mailto:bdrewery@freebsd.org>> wrote: >=20 > On 8/21/15 8:15 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > Author: imp > > Date: Fri Aug 21 15:15:22 2015 > > New Revision: 286995 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286995 > > > > Log: > > Document bsd.progs.mk <http://bsd.progs.mk>, including its > status as being strongly > > discouraged and that it will be going away as soon as is > practicable. > > > > Modified: > > head/share/mk/bsd.README >=20 > I find this functionality irreplaceable for simplicity. The alterna= tive > is more Makefiles for simple extra progs. Granted it has meta mode > dirdeps issues but I think that is acceptable as there are other wa= ys to > address that. >=20 > Where is this deprecation coming from? Is it just due to bapt's > in-progress (but not working) patch at https://reviews.freebsd.org/= D3444 > to remove bsd.progs.mk <http://bsd.progs.mk>; in place of PROGS in > bsd.prog.mk <http://bsd.prog.mk>? >=20 > I would like to document PROGS properly. I had no idea how it worke= d > until reading over it tonight. If the plan wasn't to remove PROGS i= tself > I will do so. >=20 >=20 > It doesn't work and has lots of issues. Those issues haven't been fixed= =2E > It didn't look like they would be fixed any time soon. It seemed there > was a consensus to deprecate it because of those issues. > bapt was part of that group, and his problems with packaging that > bsd.progs.mk <http://bsd.progs.mk>; creates played into this decision. >=20 > If the issues are fixed, then we can change our recommendations based > on the changed circumstance. >=20 > Warner Yes I think I've addressed the issues. I'm still testing and will have it committed soon. It is still fragile, but most of share/mk is. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --JIRWlWAJMvTisCumawSwMO3sGWToflDiW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWAtsTAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPdG0H/R+8f6hN9Q+k/HFCngbMd8MG kqbXhvRv2W7WvI75ZzIv9fZKL72vj5VGnAX3Vz7ABWUb6tIR5aFgzfeqldTrPWzl jSGZW0IXtFnULXqWzy0NlmDLq/tYOULH5XBj7GdR7xZgf/2r9hqwwpSqXonZznEg b+sPKSdqSuUKN/9AunwwRQ4LLyBZAXY/O1iX445D9bwQfhKAEAjHbNPH2y7CvZIS 0aNG3HyQTWj0SmSA7JyVdZI7rouafa/0WEgpzTyx08s03rdpvGplGlAolfBVaNA/ 9zGSlPFX87umPc06RRpn+nOJbc/EB3NvBDs5siabhBExIVGBJSzKCvvQ6rahcFE= =kI3O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JIRWlWAJMvTisCumawSwMO3sGWToflDiW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5602DB13.2000202>