Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:19:42 -0500 From: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.dyndns.org> To: Dimitar Peikov <mitko@rila.bg> Cc: binup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <20011029101941.B94698@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200110291156.f9TBuhX81764@earth.rila.bg> References: <200110291156.f9TBuhX81764@earth.rila.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon Oct 29, 2001 at 01:56:43PM +0200, Dimitar Peikov wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry, but it'seems to me that someone must take control more hard on this > project! I mean that someone must be responsible what is to be done there, not > all subscribers to blame on maillist what is what to do and so on. We just need people to start working on this, and for that, people must agree on general directions. We're seeing that discussion, for one, and I think the work is also under way. :) > As I saw this thread I got these conclusions : > > 1. Project must use libh for installation purposes. Not necessarly, but yes, libh should probably be FreeBSD native package format. > 1.a. To use libh there must be documentation available what libh is exactly There is. It is not complete, and is scattered. I see this as one of the main things on the task list of libh. :) > 1.b. Other libraries, modules, packages or what the project would depends on I don't understand that line. > 2. Server side part - currently we have only requirements Not true. Code has been written and is available from the projects webpage. From what I understand, the server side part is the one that's almost complete. > 2.a. Specification done. > 2.b. Implementation almost done. > 3. Client side part - currently we have only requirements We also have code, it's just not functional yet. > PS: > I havent in mind to argue someone particular, but I see that in this project > there are only requests what should it be not something really done or > proposal. I understand Paul and Joe are and have been working on an API proposal, so I guess it's what should settle things down. A. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjvdc40ACgkQttcWHAnWiGduJQCfT+h1NN0bdkO2IUkR6Y7bmUgm eagAoIi1UBCNqObnsPmRSNVfguVvJAXS =iE/B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011029101941.B94698>