Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:39:39 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        nwhitehorn@freebsd.org
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r209511 - head
Message-ID:  <20100624.143939.85384790471796385.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100624151959.6b00bfdd@anacreon.physics.wisc.edu>
References:  <201006241753.o5OHrPnU058288@svn.freebsd.org> <20100624151959.6b00bfdd@anacreon.physics.wisc.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20100624151959.6b00bfdd@anacreon.physics.wisc.edu>
            Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> writes:
: On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:53:25 +0000 (UTC)
: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
: 
: > Author: imp
: > Date: Thu Jun 24 17:53:25 2010
: > New Revision: 209511
: > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209511
: > 
: > Log:
: >   Merge from tbemd:
: >   
: >   use MACHINE_CPUARCH instead of MACHINE_CPU since the sources for the
: >   CSU is based on MACHINE_CPUARCH
: >   
: >   Reviewed by:	arch@ (twice)
: 
: This is not always true. For example, on powerpc64, the ABI is
: different enough between powerpc and powerpc64, which share a CPUARCH,
: that the csu code shares very little. I can work around this with
: Makefile or preprocessor hacks, of course, but would be it be possible
: here instead to check for MACHINE_ARCH before falling back to
: MACHINE_CPUARCH?

I can do the nested search.  It won't break mips or arm, since the
mipsel or mipseb variant won't exist...

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100624.143939.85384790471796385.imp>