Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Feb 1998 23:09:56 -0800 (PST)
From:      Jim Shankland <jas@flyingfox.com>
To:        joe@thebestisp.com
Cc:        freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Fw: FreeBSD firewall questions
Message-ID:  <199802120709.XAA03963@biggusdiskus.flyingfox.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> And second [with a hub] you can't expect to get better that 60%(+-)
> ie: 6Mbps rather than 10Mbps throughput so you are paying for latency
> and collissions..

Woops.  Crap detector just went off.

You should actually try this out; do your two hosts that get 10 Mb/s
throughput on a point-to-point cable get 6 Mb/s throughput when those
two hosts (only) are connected through a hub?  If so, throw the hub
into the trashcan and get another.

You're right, though, that a hub is unnecessary to connect two hosts
point-to-point.  And if the interface cards support it, you can run
the point-to-point line in full-duplex; for that matter, with
10/100 cards running $60 or less, at 100 Mb/s.  100 Mb hub and switch
prices are dropping fast, but they're not yet down to a trivial level.

Jim Shankland
Flying Fox Computer Systems, Inc.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802120709.XAA03963>