Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:16:00 -0400 From: Michael Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: netchild@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Quo vadis, -CURRENT? (recent changes to cc & compatibility) Message-ID: <20030910201600.GA37408@wombat.localnet> In-Reply-To: <20030910193257.GB77756@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <3F5F2774.9010408@gmx.net> <20030910165454.7cc2342c.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <20030910164141.GA36649@wombat.localnet> <20030910193257.GB77756@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> [030910 15:33]:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:41:41PM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> > gnome2 depends on gnomemedia2.
> > gnomemedia2 depends on gstreamer-plugins.
> > gstreamer-plugins fails because ARTSD_FLAGS in several dozen Makefiles
> > includes -pthread.
>=20
> This is being worked on from the compiler stand point.
Which is the main reason I didn't do a pr on it. But from reading other
parts of the thread, it seems that ports should not be using -pthread
anyway... would it be worthwhile to submit patches to remove -pthread
(and, for that matter, -lpthread and other variants) in favor of
${PTHREAD_LIBS} regardless of wether `cc -pthread` is an error or a
no-op, or some magical auto-thread-library-selector?
--Mike
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/X4aACczNhKRsh48RAiemAKCO5ybpxL/oBz5mpHKbweEz/0sIbACfU7xd
WarWMTSc+zSH/+ZKJr8K3Ws=
=RPxX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030910201600.GA37408>