Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:49:53 -0600 From: Craig Boston <craig@xfoil.gank.org> To: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Subject: Re: Silly IRQ allocation on Dell 1950 Message-ID: <20061103144953.GA94194@nowhere> In-Reply-To: <E1GfwlC-000Lrw-Pa@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> References: <XFMail.20061102080327.jdp@polstra.com> <454A1E47.9060200@samsco.org> <E1GfwlC-000Lrw-Pa@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:58:54PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > with all the hipe on virtualization, I'm wandering if the day > will come and we will have virtual irqs ... MSI could very well be described as a "virtual irq". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_Signaled_Interrupts Craig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061103144953.GA94194>