Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:30:55 +0400 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Greg Lewis <glewis@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/java/openjdk6 Makefile ports/java/openjdk7 Makefile Message-ID: <86vd7nbt4w.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201008012222.o71MMirC065381@repoman.freebsd.org> (Greg Lewis's message of "Sun, 1 Aug 2010 22:22:44 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <201008012222.o71MMirC065381@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lewis <glewis@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> glewis 2010-08-01 22:22:44 UTC
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> java/openjdk6 Makefile
> java/openjdk7 Makefile
> Log:
> . Mark MAKE_JOBS_SAFE.
> . Use MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER as HOTSPOT_BUILD_JOBS.
>
> PR: 148753
> Submitted by: David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com>
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.26 +5 -3 ports/java/openjdk6/Makefile
> 1.13 +5 -4 ports/java/openjdk7/Makefile
Does this work? I'm just confused why the committer outsmarted submitter
by silently dropping some important parts[1] of the patch in ports/148753.
I can still reproduce that error reported by QAT. But pointyhat seems to
not use make jobs so it's not in its logs[2].
[1] the workaround for ports/148754 - empty _MAKE_JOBS after bsd.port.post.mk
[2] empty HOTSPOT_BUILD_JOBS indicates make jobs are not used
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/openjdk-7.0.82_1.log
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86vd7nbt4w.fsf>