Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:29:04 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193212] [stage] sysutils/bsdconfig Message-ID: <bug-193212-13-ZiOGxFua8N@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193212-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193212-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193212 --- Comment #16 from C Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #15) > (In reply to Daniel Austin from comment #10) > > a simple 'make stage-qa' will give you the above info, or build using > > DEVELOPER=yes, or run it through poudriere. > > > > Specifically: Read that line again and again until you unstand what he > means. We've mentioned "make stage-qa" 50 times and it seems that it's > going over your head. OH. I understand. FWIW here is the make.conf(5) for poudriere DEVELOPER=yes USE_PORTLINT=yes USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS=yes BATCH=yes WRKDIRPREFIX=/wrkdirs Am I missing anything? Why is there no poudriere.conf man page? I also can't find any "ports production" related material for poudriere. Only package related information. I really feel like the requirement for using poudriere, a bit premature. Given that the use of make(1) install/deinstall/stage/* plist/ {...} will frequently pollute the system it's on, and, as mentioned; the lack of pertinent info, where poudriere is concerned. I would probably have been better off using a dump(8) restore(8) scheme. To provide a fresh system to work in after thoroughly testing each port. Or perhaps devise some chroot(8) scheme. In short; I think I spent too much time attempting to employ a development scheme, on something that isn't [yet] readily adapted to, without a great deal of experimentation, trial, and error. Don't get me wrong, I am all too aware of that being a big part of general development. But in this case [poudriere] isn't [yet] the most expedient approach. Thanks for your thoughtful reply. --Chris P.S. I have no issue with your choice of Daniels patch, over mine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193212-13-ZiOGxFua8N>