Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:30:08 -0700 From: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: backporting to 3.5 Message-ID: <395AC2C0.BA93E640@gorean.org> References: <16419.962247023@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
>
> > Is there going to be a policy regarding what to backport to 3.5?
> > My personal opinion is that if we backport too much we reduce the
> > users' motivation to move to ...
>
> Whatever people wish to back-port to it, within reason.
I think what I was asking about was a clearer definition of "within
reason," but so be it.
> Your personal
> opinion aside, we don't engage in social engineering around here by
> holding back fixes in attempt to force users to switch.
Please don't mischaracterize what I said. I specifically referred to
fixes as something which should be expected to backport. I have a fleet
of 3.x machines that I don't plan to upgrade any time soon, so I'm
interested in protecting the branch as much as anything else.
I started to type out some kind of response to the rest of your post,
but apparently I've (yet again) stepped on some nerve of yours, so I
will just let it stand at that.
Doug
--
"Live free or die"
- State motto of my ancestral homeland, New Hampshire
Do YOU Yahoo!?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?395AC2C0.BA93E640>