Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:47:52 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: mdf@FreeBSD.org Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Subject: Re: svn commit: r235797 - head/contrib/gcc Message-ID: <20120523234752.GB22380@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <CAMBSHm-C7YdU0uPa7aJ6FxDWhZzQiD0_uTj=f1nhV2k5SZ5%2B_A@mail.gmail.com> References: <201205221818.q4MII7lk019626@svn.freebsd.org> <20120523050739.H3621@besplex.bde.org> <CAMBSHm-C7YdU0uPa7aJ6FxDWhZzQiD0_uTj=f1nhV2k5SZ5%2B_A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:07:22PM -0700, mdf@FreeBSD.org wrote: > We run with the following at Isilon, which is somewhat bogus because > it allows a bit of sloppiness in types, but is also terribly > convenient since it means no casting on printf arguments is needed: ... > If there's no objections, I (or David or anyone else) can commit to > the FreeBSD repository. Unfortunately I don't like this change -- it promotes type sloppiness that flies in the face of ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E). the mixed definition of [u]_?int64_t as it catches improper code -- such as assuming you can printf an int64_t with "%lld" when that is against the standard. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120523234752.GB22380>