Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 22:20:38 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Cc: chiuk@cs.indiana.edu, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting Up a Kernel Hacking Machine Message-ID: <199610140320.WAA22718@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199610140205.LAA11038@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Oct 14, 96 11:34:58 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > As a general rule, -current is stable enough for development. If you > lurk on the -current list and avoid building new kernels for a day or > so after people like John make major changes, it's actually very good. > I generally agree with that. We (I) do need help when I have made large VM changes though. I am going to resurrect my policy of warning people a day or so before any risky changes. When I do warn people, I really don't mind when they ask for me to put them off for a day or so. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610140320.WAA22718>