Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 06:19:45 +1100 (EST) From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: k.keithley@opengroup.org (Kaleb S. KEITHLEY) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: _POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS and *_r functions Message-ID: <199802271919.GAA17326@cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <34F6EC08.F6@opengroup.org> from "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" at "Feb 27, 98 11:38:32 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > That means that if you don't have the Thread Safe Functions, then you > can't define _POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS. (And therefore you can't > define _POSIX_THREADS, which is sort of the reverse of the claim that if > you define _POSIX_THREADS then you must define > _POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS.) Hmm, I've always read the "otherwise" case as making these functions optional, but now you've made me reread the clauses, I think I agree that _POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS means these functions should be there. I think they should be in libc, not just libc_r. -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@netbsd.org; jb@freebsd.org CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802271919.GAA17326>