Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To:        Kenneth Culver <culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <20040629181248.S54069@carver.gumbysoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040629103106.gpw4kwscsg88k0c8@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>
References:  <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040629103106.gpw4kwscsg88k0c8@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Kenneth Culver wrote:

> It runs OK, with some minor nits compared to x86 version. I'm not sure
> what the
> laptop maker is talking about... but if you boot the x86 version of FreeBSD,
> it'll work. I think they meant you can't switch from amd64 to x86 after
> already
> booting an OS.

Me either. -current actually supports running i386 binaries in amd64 mode.
Thats one of the processor's features. :-)

You can't run amd64 binaries when booted into an i386 OS, of course.

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040629181248.S54069>