Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 22:06:50 -0500 From: Jonathan Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> To: Ihsan Dogan <ihsan@dogan.ch> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firefox stuck in libthr or kserel! Message-ID: <4275994A.7090801@alumni.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050501151831.GC19105@dogan.ch> References: <20050421202042.GA82753@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050421205902.6F3E75D07@ptavv.es.net> <20050429143529.GA88104@nowhere> <20050501151831.GC19105@dogan.ch>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 05/01/05 10:18, Ihsan Dogan wrote: > On Friday, 29 Apr 2005 09:35 -0500, Craig Boston wrote: >>>This is a problem that has been brought up on gnome@, ports@ and >>>current@ from time to time. There are many, many sites, all heavily >>>flash based, that exhibit this problem with any native browser to use >>>the linux flash6 plugin. As the flash code is the linux binary, it is >>>not likely to be there. (These sites don't hang on linux systems.) >> >>FWIW, I use linux-mozilla-1.7.5 and linux-flashplugin-7.0r25_1 to access >>flash based sites with no problem. The flash6/7 problems seem to be >>related to using the pluginwrapper to get it to work with native >>browsers. > > Can linux-mozilla and mozilla co-exist on the same machine? Yes they can. They install to separate places and use different directories for configuration information. By the way: If you are using ports than you will be told when a port cannot be installed because it conflicts with another. To find this out manually, check for a CONFLICTS entry in the port Makefile. -- Jonathan Noack | noackjr@alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195 [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCdZlPUFz01pkdgZURAnxcAJ4mtVA4IlbMd2vfsyOhHIkpnyIWiQCgj+w6 +pnWNsxd3QRY4duJbfMUWVc= =MxEJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4275994A.7090801>