Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:32:00 +0100 From: spellberg_robert <emailrob@emailrob.com> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why?? (prog question) Message-ID: <49D4BE50.4000007@emailrob.com> References: <200904021356.n32DunH9023619@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, muffy; hi, biff --- golly, gee_whillikers, kids, i always thought it was "undent"; equal length, minimum diff. see you all at the malt_shop, after the sock_hop. rob Oliver Fromme wrote: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> writes: > > > William Gordon Rutherdale wrote: > > > > [...] I don't think I've ever written the word "dedent" in my life, > > > > at least until this paragraph. In fact, I'm not convinced that it > > > > IS a word. > > > It's a technical term, > > > > No, the correct term is "outdent". > > It probably depends on who you ask. For example, the > Python people call it "dedent". I've also heard it from > many Eclipse developers. On the other hand, I've rarely > heard anyone using the word "outdent". YMMV, I guess. > > Best regards > Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49D4BE50.4000007>