Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 00:11:36 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: May 17th UP machine 'panic' Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980523233045.1499B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980523000855.24959B-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The panic is saying that proc 26748 is trying to unlock an exclusive lock owned by proc 1. It doesn't seem to be as you describe. This might not have anything to do with quotas at all. Is vfs_unmountall() in the trace? Regards, Mike Hancock On Sat, 23 May 1998, Julian Elischer wrote: > you have quotas right? > the addition of the locking intot he kernel was done without taking into > account quotas and when winding up the quota file it locks it and then > tries to lock and release all open files. > then when it gets to teh quota file.. > oops it's already locked.... > panic .. > > I have no fix yet but I see this here and am planning on tracking it down > this weekend. > > > On Fri, 22 May 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > > On a reboot, I get: > > > > syncing disks... 68 51 25 done > > panic: lockmgr: pid 26748, not exclusive lock holder 1 unlocking > > > > When I reported this the first time through, the comment had to do with > > multiple CPUs...except this is a UP motherboard... > > > > Does anyone know why I would be getting this, or if there has been a fix > > for it in the past 5 days that I haven't clued into on the commit list? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.980523233045.1499B-100000>
