Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:07:55 +0000 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, Christian Kratzer <ck@cksoft.de>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Import src/sys/sys/hash.h from OpenBSD/NetBSD Message-ID: <1142420875.823.39.camel@mayday.esat.net> In-Reply-To: <22176.1142358505@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <22176.1142358505@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 18:48 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20060314184157.V10576@vesihiisi.cksoft.de>, Christian Kratzer writes:
>
> >> IMHO, Open{BGP,OSPF}D belong in src/contrib, not in ports/net.
> >
> >please don't bloat the base system with something that can run
> >equally well from ports.
>
> I would tend to agree.
>
> 90% or more of all FreeBSD systems will not run either of these routing
> daemons, so their rightful place is in ports.
>
> Also, considering the general hazzleness of src/contrib I think ports
> offer a far more flexible infrastructure for dealing with the software
> (such as openospfd-stable vs openospfd-cvs versions etc.)
I'll add openbgpd-devel and openospfd-devel while this is being debated.
There are pros and cons having them in src/, but in the meantime it will
be available for people willing to test them.
--
Florent Thoumie
flz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Committer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1142420875.823.39.camel>