Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 08:20:06 +0000 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: "Richard Wackerbarth" <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: "freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG>, "hackers@FreeBSD.ORG" <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Peter Wemm" <peter@jhome.DIALix.COM> Subject: Re: Re(2): new sup server Message-ID: <7569.827569206@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "22 Mar 1996 21:20:12 CST." <n1384592440.78725@Richard Wackerbarth>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > [peter] > > CTM would be *far* better to feed the mirrors with, if only it preserved the > > timestamps of the files. (phk: hint hint! :-) > > [rkw] > Well, I totally agree. And I have a suggestion that would be very easy to > implement. > > All we need to do is add a directive to ctm to set the timestamps to a FIXED > time for that update. That way ALL the sup mirrors, and anyone else who gets > the ctm update, would have the same time for each file, namely the timestamp > associated with the last ctm update of that file. Hmm, nice idea... There already is a nice timestamp in the top of an CTM delta, perfectly suitable for that. Good thinking! Send me a patch asap! :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7569.827569206>