Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:45:18 -0600 From: "Wolfpaw - Dale Corse" <admin-lists@wolfpaw.net> To: <pi@LF.net> Cc: 'Spidey Knepscheld' <spidey@act.co.za> Subject: RE: Traffic Monitor Message-ID: <01de01c42880$d0255910$b8a6b38e@wolf> In-Reply-To: <20040422152131.GZ55822@complx.LF.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Meh.. I guess :P I'm just one of those people that prefers Things run as close to perfect as possible :) D. > -----Original Message----- > From: Kurt Jaeger [mailto:lists@complx.LF.net] > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:22 AM > To: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse > Cc: 'Spidey Knepscheld'; freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Traffic Monitor > > > Hi! > > > > to a 100base switch. The reason I used the 10base HUB is > > > because it broadcasts all the data to all the ports. So for > > > all data to and from the firewall will be caught by the > > > Monitoring BSD box. I hope this makes sense. > > > > That is an _extremely_ bad idea. Hubs have major collisions, > > Yes, but he only has a 256 kbit uplink. Therefore, that's OK. > > -- > MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger > 16 years to go ! > LF.net GmbH fon +49 711 90074-23 pi@LF.net > Ruppmannstr. 27 fax +49 711 90074-33 > D-70565 Stuttgart mob +49 171 3101372 > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------- > This message has been scanned for Spam and Viruses by ClamAV > and SpamAssassin > -------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------- > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01de01c42880$d0255910$b8a6b38e>