Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Jan 2020 20:31:52 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 243319] Panicked laptop & local network ARP flood
Message-ID:  <bug-243319-7501-3Q0UhgEWpD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-243319-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-243319-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243319

--- Comment #7 from Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #6)

Hmm... yeah, good point- I misread '18' as '16', and those are actually the=
 two
Windows boxen on the local segment; 10.6.112.1 being the gateway for this v=
lan.

I'll work on another repro and see if I can't get more context. The flood s=
eems
to just be a side-effect of whatever's cutting off the local network, rather
than the cause. This still has to be the result of something this NIC is do=
ing
periodically -- disconnecting it immediately remedies the situation and loc=
al
connectivity is restored, and the behavior is consistent but not immediately
triggered upon panic. Nagios lets us know quickly when this laptop's taken =
down
the Windows machines.

This is the context leading up to that particular flood:

07:55:35.211083 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
8070.04:c5:a4:5e:0d:80.8098, length 43
07:55:35.650045 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 query
07:55:36.650033 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 reply
07:55:37.211468 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
8070.04:c5:a4:5e:0d:80.8098, length 43
07:55:37.650026 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 reply
07:55:38.650003 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 reply
07:55:39.186264 IP 10.6.112.1 > ospf-all.mcast.net: OSPFv2, Hello, length 56
07:55:39.209654 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
8070.04:c5:a4:5e:0d:80.8098, length 43
07:55:39.649990 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 reply
07:55:40.649980 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 query
07:55:41.211537 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
8070.04:c5:a4:5e:0d:80.8098, length 43
07:55:41.649960 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 query
07:55:42.649947 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 query
07:55:43.210181 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
8070.04:c5:a4:5e:0d:80.8098, length 43
07:55:43.649929 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 query
07:55:44.649936 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 query
07:55:45.208168 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
8070.04:c5:a4:5e:0d:80.8098, length 43
07:55:45.649903 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 query
07:55:46.649907 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 query
07:55:47.229691 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
8070.04:c5:a4:5e:0d:80.8098, length 43
07:55:47.649898 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 query
07:55:48.216500 IP 10.6.112.1 > ospf-all.mcast.net: OSPFv2, Hello, length 56
07:55:48.649860 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 reply
07:55:49.255548 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
8070.04:c5:a4:5e:0d:80.8098, length 43
07:55:49.649850 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 reply
07:55:50.649836 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 reply
07:55:51.227859 STP 802.1d, Config, Flags [none], bridge-id
8070.04:c5:a4:5e:0d:80.8098, length 43
07:55:51.649821 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 reply
07:55:52.649815 68:1c:a2:10:41:10 (oui Unknown) > Broadcast, RRCP-0x23 reply

68:1c:a2:10:41:10 is the unmanaged switch immediately upstream from the lap=
top.
That unmanaged switch currently has yet another unmanaged switch of the same
model upstream from it that I had setup ~5 months ago to try and isolate the
problem, as this has been ongoing and consistent over the last 6+ months at
least (I don't panic it that frequently). Immediately upstream from that on=
e is
a managed switch. The Windows boxen lay on the most-upstream switch, while =
this
laptop and another FreeBSD laptop are on the lowest switch.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243319-7501-3Q0UhgEWpD>