Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:37:46 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Ben Kaduk <minimarmot@gmail.com>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Subject: Re: svn commit: r227797 - head/share/mk Message-ID: <CAGE5yCo26amQ%2B%2B8CTf_TX60PnSQeagf8oLzKV02pSRyRTWL_zw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4ECC2D0D.6080608@FreeBSD.org> References: <201111211635.pALGZvSS051067@svn.freebsd.org> <4A740CCF-AB73-41E3-B2C6-344B4A067B00@FreeBSD.org> <8662ibkfjs.fsf@ds4.des.no> <D9B93827-6143-4ED2-9821-34F526F76D58@FreeBSD.org> <CAK2BMK6Fhn1D_gyNdHST8uSbkm00bt1DmouxHYCTFphAYeTz_Q@mail.gmail.com> <4ECC2D0D.6080608@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 11/22/2011 2:26 PM, Ben Kaduk wrote: >> 2011/11/22 Rui Paulo <rpaulo@freebsd.org>: >>> On 2011/11/22, at 21:33, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >>> >>>> Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> writes: >>>>> With this change, I can no longer update a FreeBSD 9.0-current system >>>>> from June 2010 to FreeBSD 10.0. I suspect I'm not the only one. >>>> >>>> Sorry, my mind reader is broken at the moment, so you'll have to provi= de >>>> more information than that. >>> >>> >>> If I had more information, I would have provided it. I'm still diagnosi= ng the problem someone else created. >> >> That is to say ... "take a machine running 9-current from june 2010 >> which has no issues. =A0Fetch a HEAD source tree and try the usual >> buildworld process, and watch it explode." >> Right? > > I'm not sure that's an interesting test case, since we don't > "Officially" support major version upgrades other than from the latest > -stable version of the branch immediately before the one you're trying > to upgrade to. IOW, the interesting question is, does it work if you > upgrade to stable/9 first? > Rui said he was researching why. However.. the first thing I noticed was this commit *adds* a .c.o: rule in bsd.lib.mk, which replaces the default in sys.mk. The one in sys.mk has ctfconvert rules and the new one does not. At face value, this alone looks suspicious. --=20 Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 "If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution." -- Robert Sewell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGE5yCo26amQ%2B%2B8CTf_TX60PnSQeagf8oLzKV02pSRyRTWL_zw>