Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:34:40 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Lars Eighner <luvbeastie@larseighner.com> Cc: pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com>, Jonathan McKeown <j.mckeown@ru.ac.za>, utisoft@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Two versions of m4 Message-ID: <87y6mvv8fj.fsf_-_@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20091027234600.A93064@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> (Lars Eighner's message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:46:07 -0500 (CDT)") References: <4AE5F897.3000103@rawbw.com> <200910270916.31033.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <20091027021723.M88213@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <b79ecaef0910270216q14421922w4acf62103322c16a@mail.gmail.com> <20091027142502.Q91143@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <b79ecaef0910271341y1aea61a6pd7bcd6c96855da64@mail.gmail.com> <20091027191626.T92033@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <57d710000910271741p7429d4feh150ecbe6cddd3d2e@mail.gmail.com> <20091027202430.X92294@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <87d448wamy.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20091027234600.A93064@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:46:07 -0500 (CDT), Lars Eighner <luvbeastie@larseighner.com> wrote: >On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:24:38 -0500 (CDT), Lars Eighner <luvbeastie@larseighner.com> wrote: >>> Evidently by making it necessary to learn yet another scripting >>> language to configure it. Other than personal profit I cannot see >>> why people are clinging like grim death to something this fubar. >>> Really, let's go past this one more time: >>> >>> "Sure, sendmail.cf is hard to work with so the solution is you learn >>> m4!" >>> >>> Did you look at the link he offered? How helpful is that? >>> >>> Beside which, m4 is a PORT. So if sendmail is not configurable >>> without a port, why isn't it a port? >> >> Can we go back to our regular hacking, please? m4 is not a port: >> >> $ which m4 >> /usr/bin/m4 > > Evidently my package database is corrupt in some way, because it shows > m4 as an installed port. I wonder how that happened, how to fix it, > and if it will bite if I leave it alone. Some ports need the GNU version of `m4'. So they install a second copy of m4 in `/usr/local'. You should be able to see the ports that depend on GNU m4 with pkg_info. On my system this shows: : $ pkg_info -R m4\* : Information for m4-1.4.13,1: : : Required by: : automake-1.5_5,1 : automake-1.6.3_1 : automake-1.9.6_3 : bison-2.4.1,1 : autoconf-2.62 : automake-1.10.1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87y6mvv8fj.fsf_-_>