Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:25:42 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk> To: Thomas Quinot <thomas@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atapicam(4) as KLD? Message-ID: <4174B366.9010508@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <20041018234324.GA1270@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <20041013205141.GA874@galgenberg.net> <416DA856.9040703@vbservices.net> <20041015093908.GA11176@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <20041018234324.GA1270@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Thomas Quinot wrote: > * Thomas Quinot, 2004-10-15 : > > >>I'll investigate the feasability of that. > > > OK, I have a NEWBUSified atapicam that can be used as a kernel loadable > module available for testing. Please retrieve the patch from: > http://thomas.quinot.org/atapicam/atapicam-NEWBUS-20041019.diff > > Feedback appreciated. :) Well, if we need to go the newbus way, we need to do it completely, ie get the ATA devices etc tied in that way as well. So in order to get this "official" it needs to be completed first, I know there has been a couble of others looking into this, so now is the time to chime in if thats the case. -- -Sørenhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4174B366.9010508>