Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:01:10 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@schweikhardt.net>, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The PR db is not for -current problems, right? Message-ID: <20010618130110.B10472@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010618143508.I1713@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@orbitel.bg on Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:35:08PM %2B0300 References: <20010616180104.A19537@schweikhardt.net> <20010618123205.I728@tao.org.uk> <20010618143508.I1713@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:35:08PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:32:06PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: >=20 > Mmm.. they mail -current, and if there's no reaction for a couple of days, > they submit a PR stating that there was no reaction on -current? >=20 Whatever. I was just moaning because Jens closed a lot of PR's=20 on the basis that they were raised against -current. I personally think that that was in error. In particular a PicoBSD one got closed, and now there's no official record that it's broken in -current, which it is, and no weekly reminder to me to get round to fixing it. Joe --v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjst7YUACgkQXVIcjOaxUBbUSgCdE1nKYw94iX3Rjr/eFQPrROD3 M74An3UVdHChF/GYXC45nUVxnmKE1sGI =yJyS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010618130110.B10472>