Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:40:15 +0200 From: "Michal F. Hanula" <frankie@kyblik.pieskovisko.sk> To: Marc Ramirez <marc.ramirez@bluecirclesoft.com> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are people using for MUA's nowadays? Message-ID: <20030922194015.GA20427@kyblik.pieskovisko.sk> In-Reply-To: <20030922104213.L335@www.bluecirclesoft.com> References: <20030922104213.L335@www.bluecirclesoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:50:07AM -0400, Marc Ramirez wrote: [...] > So, what are you young hipsters using to read main and filter spam? mutt (as it sucks less). Sylpheed (as it's almost as easy to use) M2 (the Opera mailer --- it's quite hard to get used to, but very interesting) My mail antivirus (qmail-scanner) uses SpamAssassin (spamd) as one of its scanners, so I can just say ``l ~h X-Spam-Status:\ Yes'' in mutt (besides, qmail-scanner checks the message headers for MIME compliance and about half of the spam comes with CRCRLF instead of CRLF (Could somebody wise please explain me why they do it? Are they so stupid, or there a purpo= se?) and gets blocked. m&f --=20 What do you care what other people think? --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/b1Af4PY2BaN84VwRApCyAJ43Md+iilzTG365KuIq9IsRj7lObACeJcB8 yHn4vQJ8e044QNIu0F4jydY= =AB6q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030922194015.GA20427>