Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:20:13 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Snapshot ufs blocking Message-ID: <20060314121908.G36625@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <4414FB7B.2050203@centtech.com> References: <4411A43E.5080500@centtech.com> <20060311043658.GA39298@xor.obsecurity.org> <4412576E.2030505@centtech.com> <20060311053201.GB40172@xor.obsecurity.org> <4414FB7B.2050203@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Eric Anderson wrote: >> Thanks. There is an uncommitted patch being circulated that is believed to >> address all remaining problems. It relies on other fixes in -CURRENT that >> are not yet merged, but if you're able to test it let me know and I'll >> forward. > > I can definitely test it - I'm running 6-STABLE currently, but I suppose I > could get -CURRENT on there for the testing.. FYI, Jeff Roberson just did a large scale merge of UFS/VFS/snapshot/... bug fixes from HEAD to RELENG_6, see my HEADS UP post on -stable a day or so ago. It would be very useful to know if these help, and if not, you may want to drop e-mail to Jeff Roberson with a detailed description, since he's actively working on tracking down and fixing these issues. Robert N M Watson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060314121908.G36625>