Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:22:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Barney Cordoba <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com> To: =?utf-8?B?R2Vycml0IO+7v0vDvGhu?= <gerrit.kuehn@aei.mpg.de>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Recommendations for 10gbps NIC Message-ID: <1375100550.21348.YahooMailNeo@web121601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20130729113640.cc41eb14.gerrit.kuehn@aei.mpg.de> References: <51F0386D.2000709@acm.poly.edu> <51F16A07.9030505@FreeBSD.org> <1374852658.90079.YahooMailNeo@web121601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <51F2A313.9070105@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LRH.2.03.1307261646050.25254@nber.org> <1374876857.42890.YahooMailNeo@web121603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20130729113640.cc41eb14.gerrit.kuehn@aei.mpg.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=0A=0AOn Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Barney Cordoba=0A<barney_cor= doba@yahoo.com> wrote about Re: Recommendations for 10gbps NIC:=0A=0ABC> I = don't really understand why nearly all 10GBE cards are dual-port.=0ABC> Sur= ely there is a market for NICs between 1 gigabit and 20 gigabit.=0A=0AMyric= om has single port 10G cards. However, I only use them on Linux and=0Acanno= t comment on FreeBSD usage here.=0A=0A=0Acu=0A=C2=A0 Gerrit=0A-------------= -------------------------------------------=0AI didn't write/ask that; =C2= =A0But intel makes a single port x540 card thats available=0Athrough popula= r online outlets.=0A=0A=0ABC From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 29 14:31:36 2013 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAAAD46 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 829962A08; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r6TEVa0l005734; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:31:36 GMT (envelope-from avg@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from avg@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r6TEVaDY005733; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:31:36 GMT (envelope-from avg) Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:31:36 GMT Message-Id: <201307291431.r6TEVaDY005733@freefall.freebsd.org> To: avg@FreeBSD.org, avg@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: avg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/92270: [ppp]: ppp does not work on renamed network interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>, <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>, <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:31:36 -0000 Synopsis: [ppp]: ppp does not work on renamed network interfaces Responsible-Changed-From-To: avg->freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Responsible-Changed-By: avg Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 29 14:30:44 UTC 2013 Responsible-Changed-Why: Return to the pool. I don't know why this PR was assigned to me and what to do with it. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=92270
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1375100550.21348.YahooMailNeo>