Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:23:13 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Luigi Rizzo <luigi@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/asterisk-devel Makefile Message-ID: <1139923393.64601.4.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060214051934.A66704@xorpc.icir.org> References: <200602141310.k1EDACg3098670@repoman.freebsd.org> <1139922838.64601.2.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20060214051934.A66704@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Luigi Rizzo píše v út 14. 02. 2006 v 05:19 -0800:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> ...
> > > Too bad we *must* use spaces for indentation, because
> > > TABs are misinterpreted by 'make'...
> >
> > Uh, what about being consistent with the rest of the Ports tree and not
> > indent variables at all inside .if constructs?
>
> if it is a requirement, sure.
> but this way it seems more readable... don't know,
> do we have a rule or opinions for one or the other choice ?
No rules, it's a matter of personal taste.
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
It's the classic Microsoft security-bulletin formula: "The vulnerability is
important (never dangerous); you have nothing to fear and no reason to regret
trusting us; we have no intention of apologizing for it or even explaining it
adequately; now go get your patch, shut up, and be grateful nothing bad has
happened.
-- The Register
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBD8dnBntdYP8FOsoIRAvSyAKC3qRO9osbNAZzdXKri01SkSIUj2QCfer6G
FAyc2UftiDyA5NikdaePxLk=
=hBJr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1139923393.64601.4.camel>