Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:41:47 -0700 From: "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd@gmail.com> To: "Peter Wemm" <peter@wemm.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TIME WARP! Re: HEADS UP: GCC 4.2.0 is coming Message-ID: <7d6fde3d0810111641s673bfc0aiac7735f517b73dd9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <e7db6d980810080136m3b47be61q87caaa401fb6dd7d@mail.gmail.com> References: <e7db6d980810080136m3b47be61q87caaa401fb6dd7d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:57 AM, O. Hartmann > <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >> Alexander Kabaev wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:20:07 -0400 >>> Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> HEADS UP: I will start importing GCC 4.2.0 bits in about one hour and >>>> plan to finish in a couple of hours after that. >>>> >>>> The src/ tree will be utterly broken meanwhile. I'll send an 'all >>>> clear' message when done. >>> >>> Done. >>> >> >> Just for those who aren't on the cutting edge: why gcc 4.2.0 and not 4.2.1 >> as it is used in 7.X? >> >> Regards, >> O. > > Sorry about that. I accidently revived a bunch of stuck email > messages from our mailing list processing system. These messages from > 2007 came back to life somehow. > > (Hint: Mailman's 'unshunt' command doesn't give a usage message) Apparently you mastered what Robert Zemekis was trying to do back in 1985 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yosuvf7Unmg>; XD. -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d6fde3d0810111641s673bfc0aiac7735f517b73dd9>