Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:38:07 +0000 From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> To: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/ocaml Makefile ports/lang/ocaml/files man1 manfiles manlinks mann patch-Makefile Message-ID: <CAGFTUwMo5=JAOBO4VWDtO=TceH%2BdZkMTnaHF30XHZAJ7%2BfXtzA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201112292033.pBTKXRb5005904@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201112292033.pBTKXRb5005904@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/29/11, Michael Scheidell <scheidell@freebsd.org> wrote:
> scheidell 2011-12-29 20:33:27 UTC
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> lang/ocaml Makefile
> Added files:
> lang/ocaml/files manfiles patch-Makefile
> Removed files:
> lang/ocaml/files man1 manlinks mann
> Log:
> - Install expunge script with right permissions [1]
> - needed to take the MAN()!= out because it causes multiple background
> shells and can hurt INDEX performance [2]
>
> PR: ports/163275 [1]
> Approved by: gabor (mentor) [2]
You should tell us in "Approved by:" if the port maintainer approved
these changes, or if there was a timeout, or if the maintainer
objected, but was overruled by a hat -- not only to keep the record
straight, but because this may affect the handling of related PRs.
In this case I found out that it was a timeout by digging in the audit
trail of the PR that was cited, but it is safer and more convenient to
have the information in the commit log itself.
Thanks,
b.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGFTUwMo5=JAOBO4VWDtO=TceH%2BdZkMTnaHF30XHZAJ7%2BfXtzA>