Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 09:11:22 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Dima Pasechnik <dimpase@gmail.com> Cc: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" <stephen@missouri.edu>, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, "freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org" <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cpow and clog Message-ID: <20171108171122.GA56093@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20171108150302.GA53567@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20171106194937.GA87725@freebird> <20171106204121.GB37361@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171106213308.GA73787@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <c4448deb-8ccf-60c2-f839-cc17ca047969@missouri.edu> <CAF6rxgnWg%2Bm2fpAjy1kF6K5YkpzWF_pAC%2BqAHhu8oysEppibdw@mail.gmail.com> <20171108061501.GA51059@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAAWYfq2VHBjrczYE4cmAHgaTPqb_kKC13rut9L1isa2ZLL0WYg@mail.gmail.com> <20171108150302.GA53567@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:03:02AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:00:40AM +0000, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > A patch not tagged by a version control system surely rots very quickly, > > as noone except the submitter knows the exact state of the source tree it > > is made against, especially if the tree is also not under a revision > > control system. > > And surely the submitter's memory is not perfect, either. > > The patch is against trunk on the day it was submitted. > The patch was created under the officical revision control > system used by FreeBSD. > Hmmm. Just looked at the patch in bugzilla. The top four lines are Index: include/complex.h =================================================================== --- include/complex.h (revision 313777) +++ include/complex.h (working copy) So, the patchs tagged with the revision number. HTH -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171108171122.GA56093>