Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 23:55:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl> To: jhb@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PT_IO ptrace(2) request Message-ID: <200210172155.g9HLt5vV000986@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20021016124914.jhb@FreeBSD.org> (message from John Baldwin on Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:49:14 -0400 (EDT)) References: <XFMail.20021016124914.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:49:14 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> On 14-Oct-2002 Mark Kettenis wrote: > The new PT_IO ptrace(2) request doesn't work, since it doesn't release > a lock. Since PT_IO is similar to PT_READ_D/PT_WRITE_D, I copied the > PROC_UNLOCK from there and inserted in the same location. Patch, > against version 1.103 of sys_process.c, attached. Good catch, I've committed it. Thanks! Thanks, I'll exploit the PT_IO stuff in the FSF GDB sources in the near future. Mark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200210172155.g9HLt5vV000986>