Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 15:14:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Marking deGianted functions ? Message-ID: <200205192214.g4JMETM0081620@apollo.backplane.com> References: <7119.1021845059@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
fgrep MPSAFE */*.c. The convention is:
/*
* (other comments)
* MPSAFE
*/
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
:Do we have a convention for marking functions which have been deGianted() ?
:
:If not, could we make some kind of comment convention so people can
:determine the liberated parts ? as more and more parts of the kernel
:gets out from under giant this becomes more and more of an issue.
:
:I realize that marking the non-safe entrypoints is the "logical" thing
:to do, but probably less practical, or ?
:
:--
:Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
:phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205192214.g4JMETM0081620>