Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:35:09 +0200 From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> To: Lewis Donzis <lew@perftech.com> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Bug 221385] [Regression] v6 mapped v4 addresses not working in 11.1 Message-ID: <F77E9000-1A97-420D-A2FE-28710563F03A@lurchi.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <490283D6-C663-46BE-9125-CCD9C49CD0BF@perftech.com> References: <bug-221385-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-221385-2472-XvbDNlHGhJ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <DFF7B75E-F590-4E15-9B6A-8E9B3BECD7FC@perftech.com> <490283D6-C663-46BE-9125-CCD9C49CD0BF@perftech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 17. Oct 2017, at 03:32, Lewis Donzis <lew@perftech.com> wrote: >=20 > Would appreciate some guidance on this. It seems like a reasonably = serious regression, so I=E2=80=99m surprised it hasn=E2=80=99t already = been fixed. >=20 > Since all of our code binds a particular library, we were able to work = around it by overriding the weak referenced socket() with our own = version that creates the socket and explicitly turns off the V6ONLY = option, but that doesn=E2=80=99t help with third-party applications. I can check later today to tomorrow if the patch is already MFCed to = stable/11. If not done already, I can MFC it to stable/11. Best regards Michael >=20 > Thanks, > lew >=20 >=20 >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 7:47 AM, Lewis Donzis <lew@perftech.com> wrote: >>=20 >> Hello. >>=20 >> This particular bug is a real problem in our embedded system, and = we=E2=80=99re trying to decide whether to go back to 11.0 or wait for a = patch for 11.1. >>=20 >> We downloaded just the one file containing the fix, but it wouldn=E2=80= =99t compile, so we downloaded -CURRENT and verified that it works fine. = But it=E2=80=99s unclear to me whether the code in -CURRENT is slated = for an 11.1 patch, or if it won=E2=80=99t show up until 11.2 or even = 12.0. I see the "mfc-stable11 = <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221385#h5>=E2=80=9D = flag on the bug set to a value of =E2=80=9C?=E2=80=9D. Is that = significant? >>=20 >> Perhaps someone can help us understand how to determine when and in = which version a fix will show up. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> lew >>=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F77E9000-1A97-420D-A2FE-28710563F03A>