Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Oct 2005 11:30:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com>
To:        jpeg@thilelli.net
Cc:        John Pettitt <jpp@cloudview.com>, stable@freebsd.org, Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Subject:   Re: Good, stable gigabit nic?
Message-ID:  <1067.FgtQRFVHBkQ=.1128785445.squirrel@172.16.1.1>
In-Reply-To: <65197.192.168.1.20.1128771783.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net>
References:  <43476167.7030805@cloudview.com> <20051008064743.GA710@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> <65197.192.168.1.20.1128771783.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, October 8, 2005 7:43 am, Julien Gabel wrote:
>>> My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine  it's
>>> saying "sk0 watchdog timeout" after a day or so of operation - temp fix
>>> is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but functional
>>> gigabit PCI 32 card that runs under 5.4 without issues. What works for
>>> you?

The Intel gigabit cards are quite good, 'man em' for details. As a second
choice, i would look in to a Broadcom based card, 'man bge' for that one.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1067.FgtQRFVHBkQ=.1128785445.squirrel>