Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:05:01 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com> To: "Brett Glass" <brett@lariat.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 release date and stability Message-ID: <1932.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1129608301.squirrel@172.16.0.1> In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20051017215302.07669a20@lariat.org> References: <200510152346.RAA20742@lariat.net> <6.2.3.4.0.20051017202509.0869bc58@64.7.153.2> <6.2.5.6.2.20051017195314.080f90f8@lariat.org> <6.2.3.4.0.20051017215901.045afa88@64.7.153.2> <6.2.5.6.2.20051017215302.07669a20@lariat.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, October 17, 2005 11:56 pm, Brett Glass wrote: >> Features=0x178bfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PG >> E,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,HTT> >> Features2=0x1<SSE3> >> AMD Features=0xe2500800<SYSCALL,NX,MMX+,FFXSR,LM,3DNow+,3DNow> >> AMD Features2=0x3<LAHF,CMP> >> Multicore: 2 physical cores >> > > How come the kernel is reporting that an AMD chip has HTT? Is this a bug? No, this is how dual core is reported.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1932.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1129608301.squirrel>