Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:48:26 +0200 From: Giovanni Trematerra <giovanni.trematerra@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>, Jeff Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic in uma_startup for many-core amd64 system Message-ID: <AANLkTinOhUM6GC9eCivroyhZCzu3EvOxc6=dFU0N-Mb2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CBD40E2.7030507@freebsd.org> References: <4C9B9B9C.6000807@freebsd.org> <4CBBEBDF.3060905@freebsd.org> <AANLkTi=O4GtAKDqEr%2BR27E5Xe%2BdGBZc0d2_=KpobtuSW@mail.gmail.com> <4CBC5719.1020807@freebsd.org> <AANLkTim-z-rNvPa%2BFDGAb7oroKB2DWxZSECti=ioH8GD@mail.gmail.com> <4CBD40E2.7030507@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Having dynamic slab sizes would allow to have the keg backed on a larger slab >> without going OFFPAGE. > > I agree in principle. > But without seeing code that implements that I can't guess if it would really be > more efficient or more maintainable, i.e. more useful in general. > Still a very good idea. > I'm going to work on that. Unfortunately I think that could take a long time to me. I hope someone will have some insight to share. -- Giovanni Trematerra
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinOhUM6GC9eCivroyhZCzu3EvOxc6=dFU0N-Mb2>