Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:52:38 +0300 From: George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mirror of Raidz for data reliability Message-ID: <CA%2BdUSyppT%2Bngjn9UXBVW1K0eDa93OB00Rd=TX31brwmAaxNy8w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOfEmZhtxvNM3kiK5mvTZCxzkTiVWKt97yAudfaxFCnjbANQ0g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOfEmZh8v5xbQqkJJ7ZKkan7Ho0FPNrXJ95S1WRpioDXVG6P7w@mail.gmail.com> <20120515102206.GA53750@psconsult.nl> <CAOfEmZiTkr9Xcj6J4FRBd4FzL1ztgEpytSAUc=wZ8DBJtXsH%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BdUSyrG-RFFjchEYfovbvORVBZNHes9r9MhhGG1d568cO-CwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOfEmZhtxvNM3kiK5mvTZCxzkTiVWKt97yAudfaxFCnjbANQ0g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> wrote: > George, > >> >> If you have 2 machines then your best bet would be HAST. > > > So, why use ETHERNET if my Machine can see both JBOD? I was under the impression that you are talking about 2 different physical machines. >> If you are worried about data replication you can always use lagg with >> 2 or more interfaces. > > > It is different than data replication. It is data protection. Storing the same data in 2 different locations is data protection. Regards -- George Kontostanos Aicom telecoms ltd http://www.aisecure.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BdUSyppT%2Bngjn9UXBVW1K0eDa93OB00Rd=TX31brwmAaxNy8w>