Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 17:35:41 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> To: Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is NIC with MAC = ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff OK? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012021729010.61629-100000@www.bellnetworks.net> In-Reply-To: <00120223213100.02062@buffy>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Thanks, but each machine is a dedicated machine.
I did pull the NIC from FBSD and put it in W98 to check to MAC.
It does have a valid MAC.
I then put it back in the FBSD box and did the following on W98
arp -s 192.168.0.1 ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff
(They are separated by '-' on the pc. duh)
Then tried to ping the FBSD box. No luck.
Also tried
arp -s 192.168.0.1 mac-address-read-from-pc
and tried the ping. Still no luck.
I think, unless someone else has a suggestion, that I am at the end of
my rope and have run out of spare cord.
Does anyone else have a simple gateway/LAN setup. And if so, what is the
MAC on the inside NIC?
Also, my current path is a dead end, then I only see hope by getting a new
NIC. Can anyone suggest a inexpensive NIC? I don't won't to spend $100 for
a 3COM.
Thanks
Jim
On Sat, 2
Dec 2000, Cliff
Sarginson wrote:
> On Saturday 02 December 2000 22:08, Jim Freeze wrote:
> > Windows does not seem to like a MAC of all ff's.
> > Can someone help out here?
> >
> > On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Jim Freeze wrote:
> > > > > % dmesg | grep al0
> > > > > al0: <ADMtek AN985 10/100BaseTX> rev 0x11 int a irq 5 on pci0.11.0
> > > > > al0: Ethernet address: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> > > > > al0: autoneg complete, link status good (full-duplex, 100Mbps)
> > > > > al0: promiscuous mode enabled
> > > >
> > > > Having never seen this before, are both NICs on your LAN set for
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > > running at full-duplex? Does "dmesg" make a difference if you stop your
> > > > "tcpdump", as I think that's why the NIC is showing in promiscous mode.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what you mean.
> > > The second NIC has always had ff:ff... as its MAC.
> > >
> > > Is there anyway to change that?
> > >
> > > > That's where my knowledge ends as I've never heard of a NIC showing a
> > >
> > > MAC
> > >
> > > >>address of all ff's. Any one else know what's going on?
> >
> > Jim
> >
> I HAVE seen this before.
> On a dual boot PC (Linux/Windows98).
> It has two NICS.
> Scenario:
> Boot windows 98 ...
> "Soft" reboot from 98 to Linux (point is PC is NOT powered off)
> Both NICS Have "FFF..." as MAC.
> NIC drivers complain like billio about too many interrupts etc ..
>
> A hard reboot (i.e. with poweroff) and problem is no problem.
> Tested in all combinations of scenarios.
> Conclusion: Windows 98 is leaving NICs in this state, that a soft reboot
> does not fix.
> {Presumable Windows 98 on exit does not clean up after itself .. god knows..
>
> Hope this helps
>
> Cliff
>
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>
====================================================
Jim Freeze
jim@freeze.org
---------------------------------------------------
** http://www.freeze.org **
====================================================
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0012021729010.61629-100000>